Prediction of Fatigue and Rutting Premature Distress in Linear layered Flexible Pavements for Different Loading Condition using the Mechanistic-Empirical Method

التنبؤ بالإنهاك والتخدد المبكر في الرصف المرن ذو الطبقات الخطية لحالات تحميل مختلفة باستخدام الطريقة الميكانيكية-التجريبية

1,a Noor Y. Younis

2 ,a Asst. Prof. Amina A. Khlil

3,a,* Prof. Dr. Ayman A. Abdulmawjoud

a Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Mosul


The research aims to study and analyze the damage to asphalt roads and load change based on (KENPAVE) program by evaluating the performance of flexible pavement using the Mechanistic-Empirical Method (M-E). A multi-layered structure for flexible pavement was assumed with load ratios of 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of the standard load according to Iraqi specifications. Depend on horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of asphalt layers to estimate the fatigue failure and on the vertical compressive strain above soil layers to estimate the rutting failure. Analysis of the results showed that the highest values of vertical stress were on the single axle in the wearing layer with a value of (639.753 KPa) for standard load, and the raising of load increased the pressure distributed by the vehicle to the pavement so that the tensile and compressive strain was higher. However, the lower tensile and compressive strain values increased both (Nf and Nr). The highest tensile strain values among the layers occurred at asphalt stabilized base coarse of the single axle of (-1.5*10-4) for the standard load. While the highest compressive strain values exist at the top of the subbase layer of the single axle with dual tires of (4.761*10-4) for the standard load. It was also observed that the increasing of axle loads produces an increase in the vertical displacement of the pavement, where the deformation value on the wearing layer of the tandem axle is (0. 8998 mm) for standard load, and that (84%) of this deformation was in the subgrade layer. However, the highest value of damage ratio was existing at the asphalt stabilized base coarse with a value of (0.04426) at standard load. It was also found that the design life decreases by 9 times when increasing the load twice the standard load, which in turn reduces the paving efficiency.


Flexible Pavement, Mechanistic-Empirical Method, KENPAVE, Fatigue, Rutting .


[1] Rind, T. A., Jhatial, A. A., Sandhu, A. R., Bhatti, I. A., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Fatigue and Rutting Analysis of Asphaltic Pavement Using “KENLAYER” Software. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 9(2), 177–182.

[2] Samad, E.(2011). Sensitivity Analysis in Flexible Pavement Performance Using Mechanistic-Empirical Method. Civil Engineering Forum, Volume XX/1 - September 2011, 1189-1200.

[3] Huang, Y.H.,(2012). Pavement Analysis and Design. 2nd Edition, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

[4] Mallick, R.B.(2013).Pavement Engineering in Pavement Engineering.

[5] Jasim, A.A. (2015). Effect of Pavement Layers Properties on Optimum Performance by Mechanistic-Empirical Method.

[6] Highway Design Manual, Ministry of Reconstruction & Housing, State Corporation for Roads & Bridges, Iraq. 2nd edition, 2005.

[7] Muniandy,R.,&Aburkaba,E.E.(2013). Comparison of Flexible Pavement Performance Using Kenlayer and Chev PC Software Program. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, January, 112–119.

[8] Priyanka, B.A. (2015). Kenpave Analysis for Low Volume Roads with Reduced Resilient Modulus Values. 2nd Conference on Transportation Systems Engineering and Management, NIT Tiruchirappalli, India, p-140.

[9] Tajudin, A., Setyarini, N.L., & Darmawati, D. (2019). The Influence of CBR Value and Overloading on Flexible Pavement Mechanistic Response. 186 (Apte 2018), 67–72.

[10] Ameri, M., and Khavandi, A. (2009). Development of Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Design in Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 354–359).

[11] Usman, R.S., Setyawan, A., and Suprapto, M. (2018). Prediction of Pavement Remaining Service Life Based on Repetition of Load and Permanent Deformation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 333(1).

[12]Gedafa, D.S., (2007). Performance Prediction and Maintenance of Flexible Pavement. Proceedings of the 2007 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, Iowa,16-17.

[13] Asphalt Institute. (2004). Mix Design Method for Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot-Mix Types. Manual Series No. 2.

[14] Iraqi Expressway No. one, 1983, Consulting Engineers, Munich, W. Germany.

[15] Standard Specification for Road & Bridges, Ministry of Housing & Construction, State Organization of Roads & Bridges, Iraq. Revised 2004.

[16] ITMP. (2005). Iraqi Transport Master Plan: A joint project between the Iraqi Government and Italian Government.

[17] Papagiannakis, A.T., and Masad, E.A., (2008). Pavement Design and Materials. John Wiley & Sons.

[18] Islam, M.E., and Tarafder, R.A. (2020). Pavement Design: Materials, Analysis, and Highways, 1st edition. McGraw Hill Education. The United States.

[19] Chegenizadeh, A., Keramatikerman, M., and Nikraz, H. (2016). Flexible Pavement Modelling using Kenlayer. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 21(7), 2467–2479.

[20] Rind, T.A., Memon, N. A., and Qureshi, A.S. (2017). Analysis and Design of Flexible Pavement using Empirical-Mechanistic based Software (KENPAVE). International Conference on Sustainable Development in Civil Engineering, MUET, Pakistan, March, 120–125.

[21] Abdel. Motaleb (2007), "Flexible pavement components for optimum performance in rutting and fatigue", Zagazig University, Egypt.

© The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani , college of engineering. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.