The Influence of Society's Cultural Aspects on Mosques' Architectural Symbolism-The Mosques Built Between “1970-1990” in Erbil city as Case study

Amjed M. Ali, Vian Sabr Qadir [Architectural Department-University of Sulaimani / Architectural Department- Salahaddin University in Erbil]

Received : 31/8/2014, Accepted : 3/6/2015

DOI Link:



There are spiritual and physical symbolic values of the mosques architecture. From the birth of Islam mosque architecture appeared in a simple form but with a spiritual symbolic value, then the mosque architecture developed as Islam spread in various regions and some new elements have been added for the functional needs and numerous styles of mosques appeared as a result in the diversity of identity and culture of each region. The research discusses that symbolism is one of the cultural aspects as it is one of the humane needs which rectifies society’s identity. On the other hand the evolution of mosque architecture mentions that new elements were added for utilitarian need and lasted a period which became symbols for the mosque buildings as well, then it sheds light on the interpretation of mosque architecture with other regions that resulted in various styles of mosque architecture. Therefore, the symbolism of mosque architecture could be obtained through two points one from its key symbolic elements and the other from its relation with local architecture. Thus, the research started to search and seeks to find the reasons for lacking a known local style of mosques in Erbil city, and the lack of symbolism in them. They even have been built in such a way that contrasted with some of the Islamic regulations. The research takes the factor of "cultural aspects" as an effective factor on appearing these kinds of mosques. The research concludes that removing some elements in the mosque building which most of them has a desirable symbolic value and besides that neglecting local architecture in the design of mosques led to lose symbolism in the mosque buildings in Erbil city. Thus, a large ratio of the architects could not recognize the mosque buildings as compared to some other buildings. The thesis sheds light on the cultural background of the society (governmental parties, architects, clients, etc.) that have a distinct effect on the symbolism ratio of the mosque buildings, unlike the project cost has a little bit influence, as most of the mosques which were built by the governmental parties have low symbolic value in spite of not having problems in the cost budget. The thesis concludes another important point which is the characteristics of the site (orientation, area and number of elevations) have a positive relation with the symbolism ratio of mosque, so the research recommends governmental parties and architects to take these points into consideration in the design of mosque buildings.



  1. Al-Jurf , Prof. Dr Reema, “Readings in the American and British Cultures”, 2003.

  2. Ardalan, Nader, “The Visual Language of Symbolic Form: A Preliminary Study of Mosque Architecture”, in Ed. The Aga Khan Awards “Architecture as Symbol and Self-Identity”, Smith-edwards-Dunlap Co.,1980.

  3. Atashin bar, Mohammad. “Continuity of identity in urban view”, Baq Nazar journal, No. 12, 2009.

  4. Bloom, Prof.Jonathan M., “The Minaret: Symbol of Faith and Power”, Boston College, Saudi Aramco World, 2002.

  5. Eliot, T. S. ,“Notes Towards the Definition of Culture”. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1949.

  6. Frishman, Martin and Khan, Hasan Uddin, “The Mosque : History, Architectural Development and regional Diversity”, Thames and Hudsan, London, 1994.

  7. Greaves, Dr. Thomas. "Messages in the Stones: An Anthropologist Looks at Architecture", An Exploration of a Common Legacy: The Proceedings. 28-31,1949.

  8. Habibi, M., “Intellectual Trends in the Contemporary Iranian Architecture and Urbanism”, Tehran, TEH: Cultural Research Bureau, 2007.

  9. Hojjatollah, Rashid Kolvir, ”Identity Discourse in Islamic Architecture”, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2(1)926-934, 2012.

  10. Holod, Renata, “Introduction”, in Ed. The Aga Khan Awards “Architecture as Symbol and Self-Identity”, Smith-edwards-Dunlap Co.,1980.

  11. Kenney, Stephen F., “Cultural Influences on Architecture”, Master Thesis, Architecture, Texas Tech University, 1994.

  12. Kiani, M., “Iranian Architecture (Islamic Period)”, Tehran, TEH: S.A.M.T., 2007

  13. Khan, Hasan Uddin, “the Architecture of the Mosque, an Overview and Design Directions”, in Ed. The Aga Khan Award “Expressions of Islam in Buildings”, Aga Khan Trust for Culture, Indonesia, 1990.

  14. Kuban, Dogan, “Symbolism in Its Regional and Contemporary Context”, in Ed. The Aga Khan Awards “Architecture as Symbol and Self-Identity”, Smithedwards-Dunlap Co.,1980.

  15. Laszlo, Ervin. “The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in the Sciences”. New York: Georger Braziller, Inc., 1972.

  16. Naqizadeh, Mohammad Taqi, “Islamic city and architecture (manifestation and identities)”, Mani publication, Engineering system of Isfahan province, 2008.

  17. Prochazka, Amjad Bohumil,” Architecture of the Islamic Cultural Sphere”, 1st Edition, MARP Publisher, Zurich, Switzerland, 1986.

  18. Rapoport, Amos.” House Form and Culture”. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969.

  19. Serageldin, Ismail, “Expressions of Islam In Buildings”, International Seminar Sponsored by the Aga Khan Award for Architecture and The Indonesian Institute of Architects, Jakarta and Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 1990.

  20. Soleimani, Mohammad, “Abstract attitude toward Mosques in Iran”, Mosque architecture (Articles of mosque architecture conference, past, present, future. First vol. Art university publication), Tehran, 1997.

21 .الثشصًجي، ػوش شيخ لطيف، "جَلة في سحاب جَاهغ ٍهساجذ ٍتىايا هذيٌة أستيل"، هي هٌشَسات ٍصاسة األٍلاف حىَهة أللين وشدستاى,ػذد 1، أستيل ،2001.

22 .الجادسجي، سفؼة، " في سثثية ٍجذلية الؼواسة"، هشوض دساسات الَحذة الؼشتية، تيشٍت، لثٌاى،الطثؼة االٍلى، 2006.

23 .الجثَسي ، سوؼاى هجيذ ياس ، " الخظائض الهٌذسية في الؼواسة االسالهية – دساسة تحليلية لمَاػذ الشىل في ػواسة الوساجذ"؛ سسالة هاجستيش ، لسن الهٌذسة الوؼواسية ، الجاهؼة التىٌَلَجية ، تغذاد ، 1998.

24 .خياط، هحوَد أحوذ تىش، "دساسة ػي الؼواسة ولغة – اثش الوؼشفة الوؼواسية ػلى الؼاللة تيي لغة المظذ ٍادسان الوؼٌى"، سسالة هاجستيش ، لسن الهٌذسة الوؼواسية في جاهؼة التىٌَلَجيا، تغذاد، .1995

25 .الؼوشي، حفظة، "ػواسة الوساجذ الحذيثة في الؼشاق – دساسة تحليلية هيذاًية لؼواسة هساجذ تغذاد هٌز الحشب الؼالوية الثاًية" ، سسالة هاجستيش في الهٌذسة الوؼواسية همذهة الى ولية الهٌذسة ، جاهؼة تغذاد، 1988.