Issues‎ > ‎Vol6No2‎ > ‎

sjes.10089


Reciprocal Relationships of Formative Attribute in Ottoman Mosques
Talaat I. Alaane

Architecture Department, College of Engineering, University of Mosul

Received : 21/07/2018, Accepted : 24/09/2018 , Published : 01/04/2019
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.17656/sjes.10089
ABSTRACT 

      

        Islamic architecture was the most obvious physical incarnation of Islamic civilization, and still. Thus, this object attracts an increased attention of architectural researchers and critics in general, especially, the concept of form and its attributes as it leads to deeper understanding of Islamic architecture models generally. This paper measures the integrated form application by the parameters of formal reciprocal relationships, which produce the final form that expresses an integrated system with formal connections eventually. These connections are usable as a design approach to achieve an architectural design with unique geometrical language that has multi-level features of an integral and reciprocal dimension. Architectural design principles of Ottoman mosques, as an important stage and style of Islamic architecture, have applied these parameters and relationships. The reciprocal relationships of formative attributes in these mosques imply a clear harmony and integration in a high geometrical discipline. The smooth flowing of reciprocity between plan and section is precise and balanced. As the basic effective feature to reach such precision in relationships is emerged from the volume- structure duality. These properties created the aesthetic phases for the general form of Ottoman mosques. It is pivotal to deploy these parameters and features in the act of producing architectural designs which have the continuity with the legacy of Islamic architecture, as well as creating the spirit of identity that has an obvious privacy, and deep civil and historical belonging.


KEYWORDS:    

Islamic Architecture , Ottoman Mosques,  Formative Attributes.

REFERENCES
1- Owen, S.P.F. Humphreys; Physical principles underlying Inorganic from, in Aspects of from. Lund Humphries, 1968.
2- Tousey, Richard G. Horstdela Croix, Diane Kirkpatrick Art through the age , Harcourt brace javavich college publisher 1991.
3- Bonta, juam, notes on the theory of meaning In the Design, john & willy, New York. 1980.
4- Wong, wucius, principles of from and design by john Wiley and sons Inc., New York,USA.1993
5- Ching, Francis, Architecture , from, space and order 2nd Edition, Nostrand Reinhold, USA 1996.
6- Clark R .H .and pause M .precedents in Architecture. Analytic Diagrams Formative Ideas and Parties, john wiley and sons Inc., USA 2005.
7- Meggs, Philip, type and image/ the language of graphic design, van nostrand Reinhold, USA 1989.
8- Gero , j .s., space layout planning using an Evolutionary Approach, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 12(3).1995.
9- Wyld, Henry Cecil, the Universal English Dictionary, Routled and Kegon Paul limited, London,1980.
10- Musgrave, F .Kenton, Fractal Forgeries of Nature in: Fractal Geometry and Applications: A jubilee of Benoit Mandelbrot by Michael lapidus, managing Editor ,Rhode Island, volume 72, part 2,USA, 2004.
11- Yadegari, shahrokh, mathematic and statics, what is chaos, fractal dimension, self similarly, self-referentially, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics at Boston University , USA 2001.
12- Smithies, K., principles of design in Architecture, von nostrand Reinhold, Berkshire, USA.1981.